by...
9/11 TRUTH: DISAPPOINTED AND ENCOURAGED AT THE SAME TIME
I want to be succinct here. "Brevity is the soul of wit." (Well, that depends.)
Okay, first, I've turned the applicable posts into a "series" for readers' convenience.
Background: A 5 min. 19 sec. video dealing with 9/11 was posted on a number of sites: "CoreOfCorruption.com - 4 Suspects in World Trade Center Before 9/11 Doing Construction."
That video dealt with old news, but it made promises. I had seen the original story years ago. At the time, it was worth looking into to see if there was anything there that would compel fence-sitting or doubting people to voice their support for a real investigation into 9/11 rather than all the truly pathetic so-called investigations that were done at the federal level. After reviewing all the available info at the time, I concluded that while the story raised many questions, it didn't have enough to wave at the powers that be as a smoking gun, given their concerted efforts to ignore even more compelling leads.
Now, the video above more than hints that there was new information that would be forth coming. Jonathan Elinoff said that he has new, never-seen-before (on the general Internet I assume he meant) documents that he would be discussing the coming Saturday (yesterday, as of the date of this post) on "Truth Jihad Radio," hosted by Kevin Barrett, 5:00 pm - 7:00 pm CST.
The 5-min. video above says that what Jonathan would be revealing would be "huge." He didn't say he would reveal all of it on the hour-long show, but he did lead listeners to believe that he would be revealing some new info not contained in the 5-min. video or in his "Core of Corruption" documentary.
Correct me if I'm wrong but Jon said on Saturday, October 10, 2009, in the 5-min. video that within 48 hours, there would be photos, etc., uploaded on http://coreofcorruption.com/. Well, more than a week later, http://coreofcorruption.com/index.php/?p =293 is still the most recent info on the subject and it does not contain anything new. What's going on? Who's making whom look bad or trying to? Did he come down with the flu or something?
Why did I bother with this 5-min. video? Jonathan had already released a documentary, "Core of Corruption: In the Shadows." "Core of Corruption: In the Shadows" is a solid effort.
Now, Jonathan asks people to be patient, which is fine; but he also said he'd be supplying new/more info on the Saturday, October 17, 2009, "Truth Jihad Radio" show that just wasn't supplied. As I listened to the whole thing, I kept waiting for the revelation. It didn't happen. I listened, and didn't let the secular-humanist, atheistic John Lennon songs put me off. I didn't let the loud advertisements put me off. I tolerated the "style," which is grating to me, in hopes that it wasn't Satan posing as the Holy Spirit initially that gave me encouragement that something would blow the lid off the lying cover-up artists running the nation. Well, Satan certainly was yelling even while the Holy Spirit has bigger, eternal lessons to teach here.
The Mossad's motto is, "By way of deception, shalt thou make war." So, what deception has occurred in this whole train of events since Thursday for me and before for Jonathan Elinoff? Will anyone else smell the rats?
After one listens to Jon's discussion with Kevin on American Freedom Radio
http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barr ett_09.html
10/17/2009 Saturday - 1st Hour: With Webster Tarpley. 2nd Hour: With Jonathan Elinoff (not yet archived as of the time of this writing)
then one may be, as I am, left thinking that there are some subjects covered in "Core of Corruption" that are handled too subtly by Jonathan or that there are some "style" issues that might better be addressed up front in coming videos, etc.
Where though does style become a cover (even subconsciously) for mistakenly following leads and rather than being as the criminal investigator who just concludes it isn't ready for a primetime build-up, one minces one's thoughts and dances with words so as to not come off embarrassed? The reasons I say that is because "Core of Corruption" is worth watching, but frankly, the nearly hour-long discussion on Kevin's show did not live up to the billing, even though it did a very worthy/admirable job in revealing how and why Jonathan is far from an anti-Semite (read here anti-Jew). What the discussion did not do is reveal anything new about the "art students" in the Twin Tower at the 90th or 91st floor, which "new" info was promised in the 5 min. come-on video. The discussion did remind listeners about how there were people who were associated with the group and who were investigated and determined to have been Mossad. That wasn't new though. Perhaps I missed something. I don't think so though. With some minor exceptions on the point of the "art students" in the WTC, I was left with what I had before I saw the 5-min. video.
I'm glad for having seen "Core of Corruption," with it's emphasis upon all the unexplained explosions (unexplained so far by other than pre-placed explosives to some degree) and a few revelations about the "art students," or was it the "movers" (I think perhaps the latter), who were set up in advance to capture on video the first plane hitting the Tower.
To hear Jonathan talk though, it doesn't appear that he has anything really newsworthy about the particular crew that was in the WTC. It is either that or he's not aware that stringing people along is not a good way to generate a following. Saying that you'll reveal things (break a story) on a show and then only say on the show that you will be revealing those things in the next few days is not a good practice. It comes off as the stuff of dead ends. Why wasn't the info given that was promised? There was no explanation given for why it wasn't delivered. The subject as to why the promised material wasn't delivered wasn't even raised. That whole aspect is not good in any case. It has definitely been mishandled or poorly handled if at all. Who has set this up? Who has been set up?
That said, what was missing from the radio show was a focusing in on, and a clear statement that, the fact that, that crew was in the WTC was a huge security breach in a facility that had been attacked by FBI-supplied "terrorists." It was implied in the discussion but in such a way that I see Kevin and Jonathan as being thrown off by the lack of new info and by their efforts to anticipate and to pre-deflect negative criticism that may be forthcoming, if some of it hasn't shown up already on the YouTube comment section for the 5-min. video, which comment section was already loaded with negative criticism before the hour show on October 17, 2009. The focus of that show was not on those particular "art students" in the WTC, while the come-on 5-min. video clearly suggests that, that would be the main subject or focus with new info pouring out.
The fact that security at that facility was supposed to be extremely high on account of the prior deadly attacks and that those attacks were conducted using FBI-supplied real explosive material was not covered. That's though why the "art students" in the WTC was a story in the first place after 9/11 and even before. If they could do it for a stunt (which it hasn't been proven that they weren't up to more than that), who else could have done what?
So, I am both disappointed and encouraged at the same time concerning different directions this whole thing has taken over the last several days since Thursday, October 15, 2009.
The "huge" that Jonathan promised wasn't forthcoming. That's a fact that Jonathan is just going to have to deal with. I was surprised that someone who could write and produce "Core of Corruption" didn't see this coming, but after listening to Jon's imploring us to be patient and to understand his style, I see that it's a hedge after the fact. Even if he were suddenly to produce all sorts of new and revealing documents (revealing huge possible complicity by the "art students" in the WTC), it would still not undo the lack in the hour show with Kevin that did not live up to the promise even slightly. It simply avoided it completely, filling the hour with a discussion on other more than indirect subject matter.
So, I went to the show, after having encouraged others to also attend based upon the prior work "Core of Corruption" and the feeling that the author wouldn't claim to be about to reveal vindicating material and then not do that, and am left to say to those who attended and who are disappointed, as am I, that I'm sorry I didn't see it coming. Although, as we all know, we always live with memories of having been let down.
Crying wolf is not a good thing. Echoing someone else's crying wolf and doing so based upon trust in that persons basic honesty is also an issue. This harms. Those who stand back in doubt about the veracity of the calls for help are aided by false alarms.
Satan is a trouble maker. Our path to perfection is strewn with learning experiences. The naysayers are not though vindicated.
I did learn in the hour show that Jonathan has fallen away from Christ. Kevin is a Muslim. Whom can one trust? Even Jesus loved the rich man before that rich one rejected the call. Of course the term "loved" there is semantically understood. That rich one was too attached to his material possessions and "comfortable" way of life to inherit the greater love. "Live and learn" is not a bad motto.
Was I taken in? Was Jesus taken in by first impressions? If Jesus had known in advance that the rich man would say no and walk away, would Jesus have even been there for that rich one to pose his question?
Did God lead Jesus into disappointment? Did Jesus give up because he hadn't known the man's heart? The event happened, and it afforded a teaching and learning opportunity — an opportunity for growth toward God. That's life.
And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God. Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother. And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth. Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me. And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions. And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God! And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God! It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved? And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible. Then Peter began to say unto him, Lo, we have left all, and have followed thee. And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life. But many that are first shall be last; and the last first. (Mark 10:17-31)
So, perhaps Jonathan Elinoff will return to the fold and the one(s) who caused him to jump the gun with the supplied new/old material won't be in his ear, as he was in mine. The rich man asked Jesus. He didn't preach to Jesus.
Peace and truth,
Tom Usher
- Technorati Tags: 9/11, adultery, American Freedom Radio, an hundredfold, anti-Jew, anti-Semitic, art students, atheist, bear false witness, brethren, children, Christ, commandments, Core of Corruption, cover-up, cry wolf, defraud, embarrassed, eye of a needle, fallen away, father, FBI, first impressions, first shall be last, follow me, give to the poor, God, Holy Spirit, honour thy father and mother, house, houses, inherit eternal life, Jesus, John Lennon, Jonathan Elinoff, Kevin Barrett, kill, kingdom of God, lands, Mark 10:17-31 , material possessions, Mossad, mother, mothers, Muslim, persecutions, Peter, Satan, secular-humanist, security breach, sell whatsoever thou hast, semantics, sisters, smoking gun, steal, take up the cross, terrorists, Truth Jihad Radio, Twin Towers, wife, with God all things are possible, World Trade Center, WTC, YouTube
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.