9/11 TRUTH: ENCOURAGEMENT
Okay, so this is Part 4 in the series entitled "Jonathan Elinoff." Jon is a member of WeAreChange Colorado. WeAreChange or We Are Change is an obvious answer to Barack Obama's oft-used term during is campaign "Change." For me, the term was already worn out before Barack adopted it. What I wasn't counting on was the generational ignorance that accompanies every up and coming generation (mine included). They didn't know what Obama's team was up to. They didn't look into the details; or when they did, they took much for granted, such as Obama's promise to vastly ramp up the war against the Muslim Pashtuns of what I call Pashtunistan (if the Jews have a right to nationalism, then why not the Pashtuns or the Lakota, etc.). Frankly, nationalism is a curse. Jesus came to divide those who know that away from their racist and ethnically bigoted siblings, parents, and offspring, etc.
Anyway, Obama's change has been very slight for the Peace Movement, of which I am a constant member. It has been only slightly more for the giving-and-sharing-all political-economic movement toward the kingdom of God coming to Earth. Jesus was and is a non-Marxist (that is non-coercive) communist, per his closest disciples in the Book of Acts, whom I term "Acts communists." Obama is for coercion of course, hence his only shifting the geographic locale where the Anglo-American-Israeli Empire is bombing the innocent to death with the guilty, unless just being born is a sinful choice of each and every soul born, in which case, the total destruction of the flesh of man (read humankind) is righteous.
That last bit is a Gnostic view that is an attempt to answer why there is inherent pain and suffering in this life. I don't subscribe, as I believe that existence in the flesh is not an anti-righteous statement on the part of every soul ever born. We in the flesh can move to righteousness without becoming incapable of being flesh. Flesh is not an inherently evil creation or device. The intent of the creation of flesh was not to bring forth evil. It is a plane of existence where opportunity is granted to learn right behavior and form.
- In God's house are many mansions.
- There is one God.
- God gives life.
- When the flesh dies, it gives up the ghost that is the spirit of the soul.
- God is the sole arbiter over whether a soul exists.
- Spirit ranges from God the perfect to Satan.
Those thoughts combined present a paradox that many are unable to grasp. God the perfect doesn't do what his left hand is up to. He stands opposed. This represents the spiritual struggle in which every soul finds itself.
Now, we are presented by the spectrum (the range from the perfect to its opposite) of good versus evil. We may toil in the middle or anywhere along the spectrum. We may be engaging up and down the spectrum. We may be seeking truth or knowingly working evil. We may be doing both at the same time, which is confusion. It shows our fractured souls to us.
So what does Barack Obama want versus what Jonathan Elinoff wants? Barack is a wind-tester. He sticks his finger in his mouth and then in the air to see which way he will go at any given level. He was a social-climber. He used this method to work the system to rise. He was something else on his way up from what he is now. He hasn't completely changed. However, he is not nearly the break from the pattern of Presidents that some make him out to be. Part of his rise has included doing what it took and takes to raise huge sums of money to buy his way to the top. He didn't do that by being an enemy of the greediest of the greedy. In fact, he works it so that he can allay the suspicions of the Rothschilds concerning his attitudes toward their Zionist Project while at the same time receiving their blessing in his working the angles against Benjamin Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman.
Why do I say "Rothschilds" here? Lord Balfour addressed his infamous Balfour Declaration to Lord Rothschild. For those who don't know, Mayer Amschel Bauer (1743-1812) took the name Rothschild. It means Red Shield. It was the sign he used for the bank he started. Mayer formed by use of his sons the paramount family of usury the world has ever known. Their dealings and holdings are un-audited. They conduct much business in utter secrecy. They operate in the world in the open and also behind the scenes in a compartmentalized fashion such that there is no audit trail available to any mundane government in the world, including the United Nations and the Empire as most people conceive it. In fact, the richest person in the world is the final-decision maker. It is he and not Barack Obama who is the most powerful person on Earth in the worldly sense. His identity is known only to his immediate circle, which includes no one brave enough or capable enough to expose him.
Of course, as Jesus said, we know people by their results. It isn't difficult to trace back to the one who lives in stealth behind mountains of mammon. That's on the mundane level. On the divine level, that one takes his directions from the dark side that is greedy, violent, sexually depraved, and itself fractured and confused, having varying and mixed emotions, not knowing from time to time whether to wipe out this one or that group and actually doing so in an extremely arbitrary, thoughtless, callous, ruthless, wrathful manner that is far, far, far from the perfect end of the spiritual spectrum. He wipes out the innocent with the guilty.
That is what we as human beings are to rise above. We are also to never stoop to the ultimately hypocritical. Discovering and teaching about that is our proper pathway.
None of this is to say that God the perfect doesn't know what he is doing in allowing Satan free rein and reign over the worldly Earth. He does know what he's doing, and it is right. It is for us to learn what is right, once and for all.
Unfortunately, the people who hypocritically hate others (there is non-hypocritical hate of evil and apostate self) are the ones who dig out the most dirt. David in his Psalms repeats over and over the theme that people are looking hard for the worst in him, people who themselves are wicked, even while he admits to simultaneously being a faithful follower of God and at the same time a sinner. Jesus comes to straighten this all out, and he does if one is willing to see it.
So, who knows the most dirt about the Rothschilds? Those who are their biggest enemies, about whom by the way, the Rothschilds dig out and expose dirt. Well, what are we to do? The honest person will work to stop being dirty while the dishonest one will seek only to better conceal his or her evil practices to continue unhindered as much as possible (with the witting and unwitting participation of the rest of humanity).
Enemies of the top Rothschild bankers include real racists and ethnic bigots. They have dug the most dirt. They yell the loudest about the evil means of the private bankers secretly funding whatever they want, which ever war they want, which ever weapon systems they want, etc., etc.
We have those who doubt the Rothschild the most who believe that via vast wealth, the Rothschilds and their clique can purchase history. There is no doubt whatsoever that those who write the history books that are adopted in the schools do in fact control the future. The victors write that history. The Rothschilds were victorious in coming to dominate the wicked system of mammon that dominates all nation-states and all of the major supranational institutions.
We have the holocaust deniers. "Holocaust denial" isn't a well-defined term. Even openly wondering about whether or not the oft-repeated "six million Jews" figure is the most accurate reflection of what really happened is considered by some to be holocaust denial, anti-Semitism, and a hate crime punishable by imprisonment. I don't doubt that the Nazis worked huge evil. They did have huge concentration camps in which huge numbers died by all sorts of awful causes. I'm not a Hitler apologist (defender or justifier). He was unjustified. He was abused, confused, and fractured. However, so too was Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild.
In fact, we all have been subjected to temptation and have fallen to the wickedness of others who were subjected before us, ad infinitum, back to the beginning of wickedness that is selfishness that is confusion itself. We have all undergone the work of hardening that we are to overcome within.
The "Institute for Historical Review" is considered by many to be a holocaust-denial outfit (borderline?). It appears to have at its core a group of Germans (ethnically) who want the world to believe that Hitler was more justified than one would otherwise understand him to be. This does not mean that nothing that comes out from them is worth reading and considering. It does mean that at the same time, one reads and considers their opposition.
"Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain's Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild: THE MEANING FOR US," by ROBERT JOHN. Paper Presented to the Fifth International Revisionist Conference.
Also and unfortunately, the Zionists do not want this. They want it to be illegal to question the Zionist Project. What you don't see are the Rothschilds standing together in any numbers saying that intellectual honesty is most important. What you do see is an attitude that the masses are incapable. That's the attitude that's projected. It is not the truth though. The masses are capable; but more so, the Rothschild's in general know it. They use Gnostic, humanist, Nimrodain, Machiavellian, Hobbesian, Straussian (Leo Strauss neoconservatism, Zionism...) to keep down the masses even while projecting a final goal of raising all boats to the top.
These people want their cake and to eat it too. They want to be able to act with impunity — no responsibility, no accountability; it's completely acceptable to ethnically cleans others, but woe to anyone who does it to them or even complains that the Zionists, who are now becoming more and more religious about it, are doing it, which they most certainly have been and still are.
Hypocritical "Definition of Antisemitism," as interpreted from the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights: Antisemitism in the European Union, by Antisemitism Reference Center of the ZionismOnTheWeb.org website
It's not the way to raise all boats to the top. The secret-society method is stupid. However, don't give positive credit to Helena Blavatsky and her disciple Alice Bailey with Alice's "externalization of the hierarchy" concept where the secret will come out into the open where Satan will be worshipped as the one and only God with the perfect God of righteousness disappearing from the minds of all human beings on the planet and beyond.
Before I go on here, let me explain that the Fundamentalist, Evangelical Christians, as they are thought of in the main, do not understand where Jesus saying that what we loose or bind on Earth is what is loosed or bound in Heaven also means "as above, so below." They don't understand in terms of Gnostic beliefs the implications of Jesus saying that the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak. What I'm saying here is that not every statement of the Gnostics is incorrect. It is only when certain Gnostics start veering off into usurping the One who is the perfect God, not Satan, that they run into trouble. Jesus does not call down the wrath. He warns against it. He says it will come on account of evil. Look in the mirror.
"Alice Bailey & Master Djwhal Khul: A Satanic Communion," by Terry Melanson
Fighting Yah is an error. Yah is not what the Gnostics think. Their concept of Yah is a self reflection of what they don't like about themselves but are unwilling to see for its hypocrisy. Jesus is one with the spirit of Yah, the real one. Jesus came to expose the hypocrisy and to warn against it. He is heavily negatively criticized by the ignorant who refuse to read the scriptures semantically. Jesus is not what the atheists who hate him make him out to be. Jesus is the answer to David's dilemma above. He is the answer to all human strife. The Lucifer to come of the Theosophists is not. That one is "Do what thou wilt will be the whole of the law" that includes sociopathic self-licensing to take pleasure and sick power in giving fear, pain, and suffering to others who are "too stupid" to do that same first and always. It's he who is most wicked rules. However, Jesus teaches the exact opposite, something certain atheists and others just refuse to recognize and adopt (real Christianity) to their utter peril.
"Should We Admire Jesus?" by Jim Walker, suffers from an acutely literal reading. He misses all the relative language. He appears to be completely unaware of the semantical aspects of theology.
So, I've introduced here many wide-ranging ideas. What about Jonathan Elinoff, per se? If you will read the earlier posts in this series and watch/listen to the various videos, you will find that I felt built up concerning the "art students" in the WTC Twin Tower and then let down in terms of their direct connection with the Mossad. In other words, it felt too much like a bait and switch. There is a connection, but that connection could very well have been completely unknown by the particular "art students" in the WTC Twin Tower. Their larger group could have been an unwitting cover for a Mossad agent.
I don't want to diminish Jonathan Elinoff here though. He did finally emphasize the Mossad presents shadowing, or perhaps more, the ostensible Arab terrorists associated in the mainstream media with the 9/11 attacks.
To emphasize that (and to let the emphasis upon the "art students in the WTC Twin Tower" move back to the "no smoking gun evidence" realm), let me imbed here the segment of the TRUTH JIHAD RADIO show in which segment Jonathan Elinoff works to get at his point that the slightly wider "art students'" group (group of some 14 of which the "art students" in the WTC Twin Tower were members) was infiltrated at the very least by the Mossad.
The whole show is here for those who are interested. Jonathan is interviewed in hour-2 of the show, so you may move the horizontal slider to the 1-hour mark if you don't want to listen to Webster Tarpley during the first hour.
Here's Jonathan's promised post about this. Please read that in-full. It's the only way for Jonathan to receive a full hearing. I don't agree with the way he began "breaking" this story (thinking that the place to start was with the Gelitin crew and their "The B Thing" art happening), but let's focus on what is actually known about the Mossad's involvement in the lead up to 9/11 and beyond. Let's not neglect that the CIA and MI6 and MI5 work closely with Mossad and against them too in a compartmentalized fashion, as Jonathan also apparently knows and emphasizes, as do I.
In fact, I had just written about how Obama can ignore all the so-called walls set up after the Frank Church Committee on the abuses by NSA, CIA, FBI, etc., then no sooner did I hear Jonathan talking about how the Plutocrats can do exactly the same thing, which is true. The top dark prince of this worldly world can reach into any branch of his worldly empire he wants and combine whatever elements from each that he wants. He isn't beholden to any human laws that say there are walls of separation forbidding him.
Obama in the manner of the Bush family is increasing the National Security State and Police State by merging the foreign and domestic spying and so-called law-enforcement (enforcement only against the bottom — never the dark princes of this world).
Here's the part that matters most:
Hanan Serfaty was arrested by DEA agents in connection to the Israeli spy ring. What makes him stand out, is that he was listed as being an art student who was apart of the World Views program, which was in the World Trade Center on floors 90 and 91 in the Lower Manhatten [sic] Cultural Council. Although he is not listed by Gelitin as a member of "The B-Thing," the listing of the identities of the other 14 students who were on floor 91 at the time was never released to the public, neither was the total list of those involved in the stunt which numbers at a minimum of 6.
[...]
Hanan was an "art student" who was a former Israeli military intelligence officer who rented two Hollywood apartments close to the mail drop and apartment of Mohammed Atta and four other hijackers. Serfaty was moving large amounts of cash: he carried bank slips showing more than $100,000 deposited from December 2000 through the first quarter of 2001; other bank slips showed withdrawals for about $80,000 during the same period. Serfaty's apartments, serving as crash pads for at least two other "art students", were located at 4220 Sheridan Street and 701 South 21st Avenue. Lead hijacker Mohammed Atta's mail drop was at 3389 Sheridan Street--approximately 2,700 feet from Serfaty's Sheridan Street apartment. Both Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, the suicide pilot on United Airlines Flight 175, which smashed into World Trade Center 2, lived in a rented apartment at 1818 Jackson Street, some 1,800 feet from Serfaty's South 21st Avenue apartment.
So, dwell on this. Hanan Serfaty "was listed as being an art student who was apart of the World Views program, which was in the World Trade Center on floors 90 and 91 in the Lower Manhatten [sic] Cultural Council." That's the closest tie-in of a Mossad agent having access to the very floors where the plane hit, not that it proves anything. Until anything further comes out about this particular person, it just adds to the circumstantial evidence that has become the preponderance of evidence that 9/11 was definitely a false-flag operation to some degree — an inside job.
This series URL: http://su.pr/1ZXzsD
- Technorati Tags: 9/11 attacks, 9/11 Truth, abused, accountability, Acts communists, Alice Bailey, Anglo-American-Israeli Empire, Antisemitism, anti-Semitism, apostate, Arab, arbitrary, art happening, art students, as above so below, atheists, Atta, audit trail, Avigdor Lieberman, bait and switch, Balfour Declaration, bankers, Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu, Book of Acts, Britain, Bush family, call down the wrath, callous, Christianity, Christians, Church Committee, CIA, circumstantial evidence, Communion, communist, compartmentalized, concentration camps, confused, dark prince, dark side, David, DEA, Djwhal Khul, Do what thou wilt will be the whole of the law, ethnic bigots, ethnic cleansing, ethnically bigoted, European Union, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Evangelical, externalization of the hierarchy, false-flag operation, FBI, fractured, Frank Church, free rein, Fundamentalist, Gelitin, Germans, giving-and-sharing-all, Gnostic, God, greediest of the greedy, greedy, Hanan Serfaty, hate crime, Helena Blavatsky, hijackers, history, Hitler, Hobbesian, Hollywood, holocaust denial, holocaust deniers, humanist, hypocrisy, hypocritical, impunity, inside job, Institute for Historical Review, intellectual honesty, International Revisionist Conference, Israeli military intelligence, Israeli spy ring, Jesus, Jews, Jim Walker, Jonathan Elinoff, Lakota, law-enforcement, Leo Strauss, Lord Balfour, Lord Rothschild, Lower Manhattan Cultural Council, Lucifer, Machiavellian, mainstream media, mammon, Marx, Mayer Amschel Bauer, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, MI5, MI6, mixed emotions, Mohamed Atta, Mohammed Atta, Mossad, Muslim, National Security State, nationalism, nation-states, Nazis, neoconservatism, Nimrod, Nimrodain, non-coercive, non-Marxist, NSA, Obama, paradox, Pashtunistan, Pashtuns, Peace Movement, plane of existence, Plutocrats, Police State, political economy, preponderance of evidence, Psalms, racist, racists, Red Shield, reign, responsibility, Robert John, Rothschilds, ruthless, Satan, Satanic, scriptures, secrecy, secret society, self-licensing, semantical theology, semantics, Serfaty, sexually depraved, six million Jews, skyjackers, smoking gun, social-climber, sociopathic, spectrum, spying, Straussian, supranational, system of mammon, terrorists, Terry Melanson, The B Thing, Theosophists, thoughtless, Truth Jihad Radio, Twin Towers, un-audited, United Airlines Flight 175, United Nations, usurping, usury, violent, walls of separation, We Are Change, weapon systems, WeAreChange, WeAreChange Colorado, Webster Tarpley, wind-tester, World Trade , World Views, wrathful, WTC, Yah, Zionism, ZionismOnTheWeb.org, Zionist Project, Zionists

by...






Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.