Organizations have ways for people to report harassment, comment spam, stalking, persecution, etc. Many of them take a very dim view of it and can and do mete out discipline. They don't want people in their ranks who use their facilities and equipment whether on or off duty to engage in such behavior. An organization's General Counsel will take very seriously any report that an employee of the organization is in violation of any law or regulation.

Don't be stupid.

I don't have to be the one to report it. There are anti-homosexuals who are not Christians. I encourage people to turn the other cheek, but there are those who will report criminal tactics while naming names and exact locations and regardless of what a Christian might say to them about doing that. Also, people who go out of there way to attach themselves to their direct, persistent, personal harassment can find themselves in trouble not only from the mundane field but also from the spiritual realm.

If you doubt me that there are others who will, I tell you that before I converted to pacifism, I had no problem stepping in between a fascist and a pacifist or some other person being attacked without cause.

There are only two comments on this site with the author name of "Zane Ullman." After only one additional comment submission (even before that really), he was informed that no further submissions would be approved short of adhering to the comment rules here; however, there are 19 log entries (that didn't go directly to spam). Only 1 is from an IP range outside a particular university. He has spammed my site for 9 days after being informed that his rule-violating comment submissions will not be welcome.

Is it enough evidence when combined with his multiple rejected "friend" requests on Facebook over several days before I had to block him and also when combined with his spamming of my Facebook Links page? I suggest to you that it certainly is. I have the notifications from Facebook. There are also many witnesses to the spamming. Two people commented on them. The spam is still sitting there in fact; and I have the screen shots, since at this point, I don't have any reason to trust that particular Zane Ullman to be sensible.

Anyone reading this would think that I have the patience of a saint in that I have not reported Zane Ullman. Even God has his limits where he allows the tormenters to have one of their own to punish though.

Don't be a psychological masochist. It only makes things worse.

I have done the best I believe anyone can do to speak the truth about homosexual fascism while also affording others every reasonable opportunity to repent of it. I have not coerced Zane Ullman to do the right thing. I have cleans my house, which is my divine right that no one can take from me because it comes directly from God, not man.

I have taken other steps in an attempt to aid this Zane Ullman in breaking off his apparent obsessive-compulsive acts toward me. Has he no friends who will work with him to keep him from harming himself?

If he persists, I reserve the right to make it known to whomever.

The more steps I have to take to get harassment to end where the other party doesn't just break it off, the worse it could go for that other party through no fault of mine.

This site is not secular, public property. Zane Ullman doesn't own it or have the rights and privileges of membership here. I'm not advocating making him starve or homeless, etc.; but he and I are separated by the Holy Spirit. His god is not mine. We do not acknowledge the same spiritual father. His spiritual father is not mine. He doesn't know that mine is the real. That's my religion. He doesn't like it. I don't force him, but he wants me to be forced by the coercive democracy that is most often demoncracy. Check the word roots. They come from the same root.

HOMOSEXUAL-FASCIST "LIBERALS," WHO SANG, "BABY, YOU'RE A RICH, FAG JEW"?

I'll explain for the benefit of others.

Your question in the deleted comment was not intelligent, and this final comment of yours is even less so. You come into someone else's house and call him a liar without a shred of evidence.

Only a self-centered, insensitive person would think that it was convenient that your comment was deleted and that I would then inform you. That's not convenient. That put me in an awkward position because of obtuse people. Everyone with sense will readily see it. You are your own worst publicist.

People are getting fed up with your type. I've been seeing it building. I'm very serious about that. You're going to feel a backlash with the way you're going.

Your Movement is going way too far. It started out with "tolerating" and then became condoning and now is promoting homosexuality while oppressing those you originally ask to tolerate you.

Your Movement has little idea of what civil libertarianism really is.

It was people like me who said to not coerce homosexuals, and now you are turning around against me saying that I have no right.... Then you'll wonder when it all backfires on you. You are not being bright at all.

You're being about as bright as the Zionists who had the sympathy of people but who have lost huge swaths because they just don't know when to quit.

As it is, I stated your question. Nothing was lost.

In addition, you mentioned defamation in an earlier comment. You should be aware that you just libeled me. Also, you attacked me here on my own blog and then requested that I friend you on Facebook and then returned here and called me a liar in writing out in the open. Your name is here. I have your email address and your IP addresses used for your comments, the last of which I rescued from spam. Because your group is slow on the uptake, let me clarify that this is not a threat. This is just telling you to slowdown and think. If I have that information, then other bloggers, etc., will have like information, even more. I do have more than that, but I'm not interested in digging it out of the verbose logs.

Now, if you have a personal connection with Zane Ullman or anyone else here who does, it begins to look like a conspiracy: an Internet trolling hit squad.

Others using the shared anti-spam have sent your comments to spam. That's the most likely explanation for why your first was not spam and your next two were. I didn't send your second two comments to spam. So, are you building your reputation as a troll?

Fortunately for you, I'm not vindictive. Some will be though if you persist in attempting to antagonize. The last thing you want is to have people turn on you in real anger with cause. You'll scream and not understand while they beat the Hell out of you for being a major imposition and not because they are intolerant in the original sense your Movement claimed it wanted. They'll also get off any criminal charges that you might try to level against them, and your Movement will be set way back and rightly so. Why do you think there was a closet? You think that wrath can't come back? Think again. If I wanted to see that, I wouldn't inform you.

So, now we are done. I've been as fair as fair can be with you while remaining true.

You said I ignore parts of the Bible. You asked whether that's not censoring.

I don't ignore parts of the Bible.

Let me remind you that I said, "If you have some intelligent questions, fine." Your question was not intelligent.

I answer this time, which is my prerogative. I will not answer any further unintelligent questions from you.

I still wish you the blessings of God, which necessarily includes the truth if you are willing.

Peace,

Tom

You tell me to be Christlike while you call the Bible "backwards" from which we know what Christlikeness even is. Of course you don't know how I can call myself Christian. You don't know what a Christian is.

As for veiled hatred, did you read this thread? There's nothing veiled about it. I hate you. I hate myself, those parts that erred, though I'm being made strait, as Jesus was, as he said. I hate everybody except God and those who are one with God. I also love you and myself and everybody except for the dead essence of evil (if you can call that a being). If you will take the time for once in your life to find out how all of this can be, then perhaps you might save yourself, per Christ. It's all explained on this blog and in that book you call "backwards." It does require a high level of comprehension. The intellectuals of Jesus's day hated it that the common people were catching on to their wicked game. Will you rise to even the level of the common people of Jesus's day?

I am definitely bigoted. So are you. I don't know anyone who isn't. It's not wrong to be bigoted. It's wrong to be bigoted against what is righteous. You are bigoted against what is righteous. Anti-homosexuality is righteous. Pro-homosexuality is unrighteous. That's how it is, and no amount of Big Lie tactics (that Hitler is famous for lauding) from fascist homosexuals is going to change it.

As for Godwin's Law, I don't subscribe. It's inane to me. As for the Nazis, I'm the anti-fascist here, not you. You're siding with the coercive ones against me.

"...censoring someone who disagrees with you is a sure fire way to show that they're right, or atleast on the right track." So, you don't censor? I'd hate to be in your home. It must be Hell on Earth. How much pornography do you have? What else do you do? Those are rhetorical questions.

God censors Satan. You haven't a clue. If you want no censorship, you can go there without me. I'm not interested. I have the rules here that are fair and just and that allow anyone who is seeking truth to converse endlessly.

The New Commandment written on your heart will be the law to you. Then what comes out of your mouth or that you write will not defile you.

That will be your one and only comment along those lines that will be allowed on this site. You've had your say. You've shown your wickedness. Go your way, and pray to God to exorcise the demons within you.

As for "defamation of character," the statements would have to be false and in this case, the person's identity would have to have been publicly made known first by me. I still have not identified him anywhere. The only way others can know who he is, is by his actions and/or by their digging to find out how he has revealed himself elsewhere. I haven't said which Zane Ullman is which.

I don't even know that all the comment submissions came from one person or even several who are actually named Zane Ullman or even the Zane Ullman who is laying claim to them. I certainly don't know. The submissions are from inconsistent IP addresses, with inconsistent email addresses, with inconsistent names, and I'm not interested in pursuing it. I'm not interested in the Zane Ullman who spammed my Facebook wall. He's his own worst enemy defaming himself by his own actions. It's mental masochism.

What an "offended" person doesn't get away with is taking correspondence where his identity is not known, publishing it in the newspaper, and then whining that the author defamed him. If you don't understand that, too bad. Intelligent lawyers do and so too do the courts.

A Zane is one in a mad scramble to associate himself with all of this what I wrote imagining that frantically getting as many people as possible to join in without saying anything of substance, such as what you've done, will help him. There is no help in the end for what he's doing. Your kind is tearing down the fabric of society such as it was, which isn't much.

"I'm not here to tell you how to live.... Why don't you just Leave everyone else alone and keep your virus to yourself." You're tedious from the start.

This is stupid, Jeremy. You are not telling me how to live while you come here and presume to instruct me on how to live.

It is homosexuality that is harmful. It is homosexuals who are lying about it spreading that virus that harms those who fall for the lie. Why don't the homosexuals stop lying instead, then I won't have anything to point out to the world about it. What else that's harmful should I not speak out about in your book: war, thieving bankers, land grabbers.... Grow up. It's all from lust. Check yours.

"If you want to believe that a magical gay hating overlord controls the universe..." I don't believe in magic, never have. You don't know the difference between magic and what God does? Of course you don't. What's "gay"? You mean homosexual. God doesn't hate people who are gay. I'm often gay, but I'm never homosexual.

I didn't go to your site to rail on violating the clearly stated comment rules. You came here. Why didn't you leave me alone. You don't practice what you preach. You're a hypocrite. So, why don't you start practicing what you preach? Don't go on any site anywhere where the owner disagrees to say anything. Then you'll be doing what you claim I should be doing.

You talk about defaming while you defame God even while God provides for you, ingrate.

If you see the light, let me know.

Ranting and raving on the internet accomplishes less than you hope, especially when you're incompetent at it. [There's competent ranting and raving? Again, brilliant, Chad]

I want to leave you with a few constructive suggestions. Please re-read your holy book, and try to act more Christ like instead of Christian. And censoring someone who disagrees with you is a sure fire way to show that they're right, or atleast on the right track. if your faith is as strong as you claim it is, alittle debate will do nothing but strengthen it.

I put more weight on requiring Zane to abide by the comment rules of the website. Rules don't matter much to him though, as anyone can readily see.

In other words since Zane doesn't understand, supplying a URL after-the-fact doesn't satisfy all of the requirements of the comment rules. It's not enough. Zane didn't engage in real conversation. Real conversation is exactly the reason for the rules and the only reason I have the blog. It only happens that the greedy and the violent and the sexually depraved are exposed. It's secondary. It only happens so that I can show the lost fold what's happening to them so they reject it all and turn again to the one, real God, not the usurper, Satan.

I'm looking for real people (lost or otherwise) to help with the real solution that is the Christian Commons.

Zane, however, is interested in choosing harmful anatomically incorrect sex for himself and/or others, among other errors. That hasn't changed with him. He danced around unable to follow to the truth. He's lost and may stay that way for an age. That's not up to me. The way he is, he has nothing to contribute of value to the real Christian Commons. He's not a Christian. He doesn't comprehend and doesn't want to.

By the way, I decided to do printscreens of stalking/spamming Zane. So his stalking, spamming, harassing comments on Facebook are captured in case he deletes them and cries foul.

He's being reckless, as this is all here for any employer or others to find. Remember, he's desperately trying to link himself here without thought about the content and pattern of his actions here and on Facebook and possibly elsewhere.

This Zane is the worst so far in this regard. No one has been as persistently reckless (a sign?). It never fails. He needs to repent, or bad things will happen that will not be within my control. They won't be on account of anything I've done, quite the opposite. If he were to have listened....

Can you guess who it is? That's right.

Those are homosexual fascists. It's a fact. They don't want anyone to know that there are former homosexuals, just as there are those who used to be addicted to pornography and other sexual problems.

They are as the banksters who have lied and stolen the inheritance of all.

They are as the war-mongers who are murdering innocents via predator drones so those fascist homosexuals can terrorize former homosexuals and others right here in the United States.

Learn the truth. Stand up against the fascists.

From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members? Ye lust, and have not: ye kill, and desire to have, and cannot obtain: ye fight and war, yet ye have not because ye ask not. Ye ask, and receive not because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy? (James 4:1-5)

Your question is moot. He's already responded with everything he had/has, which was nothing. He submitted nothing but more of the same. He wrote that I have the last word. I do if that's what I choose on a case-by-case basis. It's my prerogative. If he gets a site, it will be his on his. That's how it is.

Read the rules here. They are fair and just. There is no unfair, unjust censorship going on here unlike on Google Blog Search (http://blogsearch.google.com/b.....#038;gl=us) that censored all but three of my posts upon my critique of homosexuality and other matters of huge significance. They couldn't refute, so they deleted thousands of my posts that were already there. That's unfair and unjust censorship. That's the homosexual fascists at work. I've refuted.

If you have a problem with this, you're a fascist. Go away.

Even if you disagree with my political/religious views about homosexuality, you should stand with me about that and against the fascist censors who ignore points and want them hidden from the general public. I haven't deleted Ullman's existing comments here. I don't remember ever deleting an existing comment on this site. Once approved, I've left them all.

Peace and blessings to everyone, including Zane Ullman,

Tom

Thank you for asking.

Jesus answered, Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath the greater sin. (John 19:11)

Never make the mistake of going with just Paul.

Peace,

Tom Usher

"What also doesn't shock me is how you've deleted his responses...." No statement of his that was showing on this site was deleted. Everything he submitted after the last comment of his that is showing was automatically disapproved before ever showing up publicly and was disapproved in full accordance with the comment rules that I set at my sole discretion as moved by the Holy Spirit. If you don't like that, go away. I don't need you. You are part of the problem, not the solution.

This statement of yours clearly indicates that you are as part of a hit squad. Your group is obnoxious and even attempts to harass, although I don't fall for it.

I debate in an ongoing way anyone who will address the issues as presented on this site. Anyone who thinks he or she can pick and choose can go away. This site is about asking, seeking, and knocking for the whole, absolute truth. Your kind and you don't do that.

This website and its comments are open to the public to read. This site has clearly stated comment rules. Read them. Don't post here again without adhering.

"...refuse to allow him to continue to express himself...." I set the rules here, not you. If he fails to adhere, he's cut off. He failed. He's cut off. This is not a forum for dodgy advocates of homosexuality. This site is anti-homosexuality. This site shows homosexuals and others dodging and then being cutoff for failing to address the points but rather avoiding so as to mislead.

"...the fact of the matter is he's not trying to get other people to do anything, he's trying to prevent YOU from misleading others." He's not trying, but he's trying? You consider yourself bright?

I'm not misleading anyone. Homosexuals and their supporters are misleading everyone into the dark. You're on the dark side. You're with evil. You're with sin. You're working for Satan, by the definition of Jesus Christ. It's my job to say it for righteousness' sake. You hate righteousness. Everyone needs to be told that about you. You like selfish harm. You like caving into wicked, filthy, depraved, harmful lust – what the homosexuals do and want everyone to misbelieve is okay. You refuse to admit that penises and anuses have no business being put together and that it is a bad (evil) choice always and always harmful. You aren't willing to say that the spirit that told you otherwise is the Liar from the Beginning. You have no shame.

"...you can't even write in complete sentences...." What do you do? Do you put periods on fragments? Grow up.

You're a troll. You may not be online much, but you came here trolling. It's a matter of degree, but that's what you've done.

You didn't comprehend a thing. You had an objective. You were sent. You failed.

"...choose to deny fact...." Zane Ullman offered no facts that dispute anything I've said.

"interperet"? For someone who puts others down for not writing in complete sentences (even though your point on that is wrong anyway), why did you misspell interpret? By the way, your comment is loaded with errors. Take it to an English teacher. Do you want me to work it over with red? That's rhetorical.

"...and attempt to rebuke them...." You are incapable of being corrected at this point. You don't know a rebuke when you see one. This whole thread going back to the post where Zane came in is a rebuke. I rebuke you and your homosexual garbage.

"Please don't mistake this as an attack as I do not believe that you are stupid...." If you thought I'm stupid, then it would be alright to call it an attack? Well, you don't think I'm stupid, but I know you are. You're stupid because you think homosexuality is okay. It's dumb to think that homosexuality is okay. "Homosexuals: What they ignore"

"...I also believe that you are a tool...." The feeling is mutual. You are the tool of Satan. I'm the instrument of God.

"...I don't believe in what you believe." You're an expert in the obvious.

"...nothing you say can sway me to your beliefs as they seem very close-minded and archaic." It is you who is closed-minded. You don't care about all the harm homosexuality does. You just want to help the lies. You are closed to God, and call eternal truths "archaic." You're working for evil. You spread lies.

Homosexuality is a choice, always, and is harmful, always. Nothing good comes from it and never will. Anyone who says otherwise is misled at best.

"I leave you this challenge: instead of blindly dismissing other people's opinions, why not dispute them openly? Tell people what you believe, why you believe it, and rebuke their opposition logically and sensibly." How much of this site have you read? You even admitted that you didn't read the whole context of the back-and-forth with Zane Ullman.

It is you who is blind. This site is huge. It says exactly what I believe. You're a moron to come saying otherwise. This site clearly and plainly dispute you. Why don't you think before you write? Why don't you read to see whether or not what you're about to write is full of dung or not? What you have written here is dung. You have shown here zero logic, mundane or divine.

As I said, you're a troll -- an Internet troll.

Get right with God.

Don't expect more of the same from you to be approved here.

May God bless you with the real truth.