by...
SOME KIND OF TALMUDIC GARBAGE ABOUT JESUS CHRIST
I posted the following on the Anti-Nazi group on Facebook:
Richard France,
You know nothing about Christianity.
I addressed your comment below where I posted the following:
"The Fascists are trying to stop the Churches from feeding the poor. Take a stand for righteousness. Visit the site and leave a supportive comment as soon as you can. Don't let any religious differences stand in the way on this, please.
"I'm not a Methodist, but I stand with their feeding the poor. I stand against the Fascist, who don't give a damn about the poor or about you.
Yet you didn't even acknowledge your total ignorance in your reply:
"interseting? its strange, but once messhiach has come, no more war, hatred or killing, so yes, not only what is jesus doing but why is he even there? nothing has changed, we still have wars, still have hatred, still have poor, unfed people !! no, jesus is greek, for of zues, zues being the ancient roman god.........of war!!!!! sorry folks, but there we are . respect"
Where I answered you with the following:
"The post was in line with anti-Nazi tactics. You want to discuss Jesus. I see that as verging off topic, but I never shy away from people who make false claims about Christ.
"God came before, but there was no instant end to evil. Jesus is a spirit who lives within those who agree with him. He hasn't left.
"Also, Jesus is the Greek for Joshua, Yahoshua that is "God Saves." If Yah is Zeus (Deus; God), then only human understanding of God's real character has been flawed.
"Lastly, it was Mars who was the Roman god of war. Jupiter and Zeus were more in line. May I suggest to you that you are out of your depth.
"It's not over.
"May Jesus bless you with the whole truth.
"Peace,
"Tom"
and with this:
"Transliterations:
"English = Jesus
"Latin = Iesus
"Greek = Iesous
"Hebrew = Yesua, Yehosua, etc., from which the English derives Joshua which is also Jesus"Now I tell you this. YHVH was a God of war in the Old Testament. In addition, it was Romans who smashed Israel, and those Romans worshipped Mars. Are you saying then that Mars was YHVH or that Mars was stronger than YHVH?
Why claim that Jesus was for war when he never called for it but rather for its opposite?
Jesus came and enhanced the law to put it above the standard of Moses. Moses and Joshua called for and committed genocide while Jesus never once called down the wrath.
In that day, saith the LORD of hosts, shall the nail that is fastened in the sure place be removed, and be cut down, and fall; and the burden that was upon it shall be cut off: for the LORD hath spoken it. (Isaiah 22:25)
He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken. (Isaiah 53:8)
Of course, the Gemara (2nd part of the Babylonian Talmud) lies about it by claiming, "before the death of Jesus this proclamation was made for forty days; but no defense could be found." The claimed "proclamation" from the Mishna (1st part of the Babylonian Talmud) was as follows: "whosoever knows any thing of this man's innocence, let him come and declare it." That's a lame contrivance.
The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine. Jesus answered him, "I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing. Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said." (John 18:19-21)
It was a kangaroo court consistent with the prophecy and why, among other reasons, Rome was allowed also under Satan to smash the wicked in Jerusalem. Who can't see it?
Now after I told you, you were wrong that Jesus means Zeus, you come saying the following again:
"i know where all this nazi hatred came from, from the death of a wandering rabbi called jesus. he thought and his few followers thought he was messhiach come to save the world from all the roman occupation, he even set one his followers up to hand him over to the authorities, this one named `judas`, poor misguided fellow. study this, the name jesus comes from the greek, `of zues`, who is zues? zues was the ancient greek and roman god of WAR, no less. if messhiach has come, why then is there war, killing, theiving, hatred and starvation still in the world. no messiach has not come yet...sorry folks and also messiach will not claim to be god, because there is only one god, non before him....just to clarify, not just a religious thing, but fact, just look around the world you`re in, stop dreaming of death and the next world, etc etc etc !!!! GET A LIFE AND STOP HATING, would be a good start."
Why do you spread such utterly ridiculous lies about Jesus? Have you ever even read the Gospels?
And Jesus said unto them, "See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down." (Matthew 24:2)
Wake up, Richard. Stop spreading lies. Jesus was talking about the Romans coming to Jerusalem to level the Temple, which they did. Not only that, but you're still claiming Zeus was the Roman god of war even though I've instructed you that he was not.
Where were you educated? You tell people here not to burn books, but it appears that you've read very few of them yourself, at least ones of any merit. Try reading the whole Bible before you spout what you believe is biblical prophecy. You are way off.
You are here to run down Nazis, but you're being an embarrassment.
By the way, if you keep this up, you're defining yourself as a troll. The Wikipedia defines it very well: "In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Inte rnet)
If I post here and you add more such utterly ignorant and misleading comments incapable of being substantiated, I will delete those comments. Put up, or shut up is the common parlance.
The only way to be one with God is to be of the same spirit. If you don't understand that, it's not God's or Jesus's fault. You'll head the other way.
Lastly, have you never heard of the Second Coming of the same one, Jesus?
Peace and blessing of truth to everyone and to you too, Richard,
Tom Usher
Updates might become available on the CrossRoads United Methodist Church
(7901 N. Central Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85020, USA) story here:
http://dottiesdialog.com/
http://www.crossroadsphx.com/
- Technorati Tags: anti-Nazi, Babylonian, Babylonian Talmud, biblical prophecy, called down the wrath, Christ, Christianity, Churches, cut off, Deus, English, Facebook, Fascist, Fascists, feeding the poor, Gemara, genocide, God, god of war, God Saves, Gospels, Greek, Hebrew, high priest, Iesous, Iesus, Isaiah 22:25, Isaiah 53:8, Israel, Jerusalem, Jesus, Jews, John 18:19-21, Joshua, Judas, Jupiter, kangaroo court, Latin, Mars, Mashiyach, Matthew 24:2, Messiah, Methodist, Mishna, Moses, Nazi, Nazis, off topic, Old Testament, prophecy, Richard France, Roman, Rome, Satan, Second Coming , Talmud, Temple, the poor, troll, Yah, Yahoshua, Yehosua, Yesua, YHVH, Zeus
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.