THE PROTOCOLS, BLOOD LIBEL, MATZO BALLS, JESUS'S MURDER, ORGAN TRAFFICKING, WHITE PHOSPHORUS, IDF ORGAN HARVESTING
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was a tract purported by most Jews to have been plagiarized likely by the Russian secret service under the Czar and from a work by Joly written against Louis Napoleon of France, whom Joly and others rightly considered a dictator who employed many if not all of the Machiavellian tactics outlined in the Protocols. The Russians reportedly embellished it and twisted it to become a seeming statement by those of the current Zionist spirit.
Here's a short take of mine on the subject: http://ff.im/-bxhET
Whether or not the shoe fits is a question for each person to discern who reads the Protocols and assesses the history of Zionism and certain sectors of the banking industry one might call Zionist. Many people who doubt the authenticity of the Protocols hold that the shoe does largely fit. Of course, it there were no parallels, the Protocols would be laughable and no Jew simply and safely couldn't shrug it off without fear.
Blood Libel
There are two main themes in the concept termed by certain Jews, "blood libel." One concerns matzo balls, and the other concerns the murder of Jesus.
Matzo Balls
This is the idea that various Jews were caught centuries ago in Europe murdering Christian children and using their blood in matzo balls.
The Old Testament contains a clear Jewish prohibition against eating blood. In the New Testament, James the brother of Jesus also worked to retain that prohibition for the Jewish Christians and Gentile converts made by Paul and others.
Whether or not any Jews have ever eaten blood, it would be stupid to insist that none ever did.
Whether or not any Jews ever used the blood of Christian children they murdered in that manner, we don't have any proof either way. Do people who call themselves Christians and/or Jews lie? Yes they have. Do many of the same to this day whitewash evil deeds? It is clear that they do. Does that prove that Jews didn't do such a wicked deed with the blood of Christian children they murdered? No, as I said, it doesn't prove or disprove it.
Murder of Jesus
The Jews like to focus on that first kind of "blood libel." They will usually only pull out this next form if and when the Gospel record is mentioned in which that record states that Jews of the highest mundane rank were responsible for the crucifixion of the innocent Jesus.
It's clear from the Gospels that the Jews conspired to have Jesus murdered by proxy (the Roman Empire) and succeeded. They also paid a heavy price leveled upon them by the loosed Satan (Roman wrath) for having ignored Jesus's message and for having done what they did to him.
Illegal Organ Trafficking
New York/New Jersey
In New York and New Jersey, a ring, including a number of rabbis, was uncovered making a fortune off buying organs low and selling them high unbeknownst(?) to the donors and their family members. There's a great deal of background to the story I won't go into here. It's readily available on the Internet.
Levy Izhak Rosenbaum is the Orthodox Jew of Brooklyn, New York, who was apparently the ring leader concerning the organ-trafficking aspect of the wide circle of corruption in which 44-total were arrested. The FBI says that Rosenbaum bribed many in both Israel and the U.S. where the organs were sold.
Now, has anyone alleged that Rosenbaum's ring was involved in murder for organs? I'm not aware of anyone making any such claims. Is this the lowest any Jews will stoop? Well, just look at the rain of white phosphorus bursting from the Israeli helicopters onto the Palestinians below that the IDF denied having done until they realized they couldn't get away with the lie. Long before the denials when I first saw the videos of the attacks, I instantly knew what it was after having seen the exact same thing the U.S. did to Fallujah and also denied - birds of a lying feather flock together. The Pentagon and IDF (Israel Defense Forces) are consummate bungling, dastardly liars whether or not some 80% of my fellow Americans are sick enough in their heads, hearts, and souls to admire the U.S. military. To Hell with the U.S. military and all militaries and such warriors across the whole of existence. To Hell with war. To Hell with crime. To Hell with lying.
It was almost unimaginably stupid of the Israeli's first to use the stuff in that illegal way and then to lie to the world, which clearly saw that they had done it, that they were innocent of having used the material in that illegal way. How does one thereafter trust an impeached, self-incriminated, unrepentant witness?
Here's a link on the organ trafficking: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarti cle/8625835
Here's a link that mentions a number things, not the least of which is the use of the white phosphorus: http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_a rticle_details.php?id=14678
IDF Organ Harvesting
Now, after the things above, Donald Boström, a Swedish journalist, wrote a piece reporting on the long-held suspicions of many in Palestine that the Israelis had illegally harvested organs from those the IDF had murdered (regardless, all IDF killings of Palestinians over stolen land is murder).
Here's a link to that article that started noisy excitement and confusion amongst the lying, land-thieving Zionists and their stupid, fascist, racist, greedy, self-centered, depraved, unrepentant, anti-Christ American supporters (my friends? hardly my spiritual nation; they defile America; they make the word to stink among the nations): http://www.aftonbladet.se/kultur/article 5691805.ab?service=print
You decide. I agree with Boström that an investigation is justified. Of course, I believe that all the grievances of the Palestinian people should be properly addressed.
- Technorati Tags: American, anti-Christ, banking, blood libel, Bostrom, Brooklyn, Christians, conspired, crime, crucifixion, Czar, defile America, depraved, Donald Boström, drinking blood, eating blood, Fallujah, fascist, FBI, France, Gentiles, Gospel, greedy, grievances, IDF, IDF organ harvesting, impeached, Israel, Israel Defense Forces, Israeli helicopters, Israelis, James the brother of Jesus, Jesus, Jesus's murder, Jew, Jewish, Jewish Christians, Jews, Joly, land-thieving, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, Louis Napoleon, lying, Machiavellian, matzo balls, militaries, murder by proxy, murder of Jesus, New Jersey, New Testament, New York, Old Testament, organ trafficking, Orthodox Jew, Palestine, Palestinian people, Palestinians, Paul, Pentagon, Protocols, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, rabbis, racist, Roman Empire, Roman wrath, Rosenbaum, Russian secret service, Russians, Satan, self-centered, self-incriminated, spiritual nation, Swedish journalist, U.S., U.S. military, unrepentant, war, warriors, white phosphorus, whitewash, Zionism, Zionist
Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you have something completely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a waste of everyone's time.
I'm not interested in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will alter it. No one needs the Bible to know it either. It's prima facie. There's no such thing as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't like it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to determine if your "point" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is still the most thorough.
The same can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the course of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I assume that's because for one, I appear to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the temple with whip in hand, not that he used it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other wonderful things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are engaged in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take offense at my saying it rather than standing with Jesus and me about it?
If others don't like it that I treat others or them the way I have in this regard, why don't they take it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the level of flies. If the truth is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the message and messenger, as the serpents did, and become a serpent by so doing?
The issue is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Jesus said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His level was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the clear and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been abused and socialized by the serpents. He still calls adults back. Those who hear him and know his voice (truth) turn around and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a human being to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and specific areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are diminished by evil that is always some form of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this fleshly life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or raise the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and family are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the learning of nurturing. Many people get better training than do others, and many people have a greater aptitude for learning and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can change for the better and best though, no matter where the starting point. They only can't if they don't — if they reject it.
Snakes, of course, also come in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc., such that they have been attackers and even devourers of humans for eons, guilty and innocent alike.
Now, Jesus knew that most people could relate to what were, and still are, largely considered "good" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to consider the wider implications for the whole of humanity. He did know that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rein them in with threats of violence and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written words in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Spirit he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "good" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "family" is everyone left after all the rest have rejected the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "modern" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touching the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand upright and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Jesus was, and is, a Real Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set about to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though — couldn't completely extinguish the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all credit to God, just as Jesus, if they had been able to completely block it.
I point out that each of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms — synonyms that are so close that they become one. The term "liberal" here is not the common usage, which common usage is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no harm in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposite of false-hearted, dark side, and dead of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both real and liberal in those senses. To arrive at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who want to drag it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Jesus and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offense at "hawks" but do take offense at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as telling to the general public, but I must tell you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is good" but take offense at "serpents"? I tell you there is no difference between the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offense at serpents when they do not take offense at homosexuality? I tell you the homosexual spirit also comes out from the dark side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overcome it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they claim it is good when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put forth in support of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but rather told the truth and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the ditch of their own making. I have watched while the movement has been corrupted into condoning what was once only to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the truth does. I have seen evil at work, and I sound the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a light to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich — for the sake of the massive flow of mammon from the bottom up (no trickledown — trickledown is a farce and always has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though — that America is headed in the right direction — because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a thing of the quaint past and homosexuals may be able to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "blessing" of the Empire while they practice murdering the innocent for the sake of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Jesus as Satan.
Whose side are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't tell the secular government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for spiritual reasons. What I want is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you submit a comment:
What you write here against the Real Liberal Christian Church founded by Jesus Christ will mark you in the Biblical sense unless you show that you have turned and are repenting in time to escape the damnation of your own choosing. That's the way of it. Don't be tempted by the devil to stand opposed to the call of righteousness. Overcome such evil temptation. Help others to help yet others to come to righteous behavior through-and-through.
Check out how even after reading this, people will still take it out of context and twist it to an evil end.